{"id":1927,"date":"2012-03-03T10:13:11","date_gmt":"2012-03-03T10:13:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/filmgaze.com\/blog\/?p=1927"},"modified":"2012-03-03T10:13:11","modified_gmt":"2012-03-03T10:13:11","slug":"this-means-war","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/filmgaze.com\/blog\/comedy\/this-means-war\/","title":{"rendered":"This Means War ****"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/filmgaze.com\/blog\/comedy\/this-means-war\/attachment\/this-means-war\/\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-1928\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-1928\" title=\"this-means-war\" src=\"http:\/\/filmgaze.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/03\/this-means-war.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"250\" height=\"370\" srcset=\"https:\/\/filmgaze.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/03\/this-means-war.jpg 250w, https:\/\/filmgaze.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/03\/this-means-war-202x300.jpg 202w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 250px) 100vw, 250px\" \/><\/a>This week\u2019s \u2018date movie\u2019, director <a href=\"http:\/\/www.imdb.com\/name\/nm0629334\/\">McG<\/a>\u2019s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thismeanswarmovie.co.uk\/\"><em>This Means War<\/em><\/a>, is wrapped in an action blanket from the start for romcom lovers weary of lovelorn, sugary angst from the start. Thankfully, it doesn\u2019t start in an idyllic Manhattan suburb either. It comes crashing into fun focus, James Bond style, in the oddly intriguing pairing of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.imdb.com\/name\/nm0362766\/\">Tom Hardy<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.imdb.com\/name\/nm1517976\/\">Chris Pine<\/a> \u2013\u00a0yes, Bane and Kirk unite. It shamelessly tries to hook the male\/tomboy viewer in with a blast of guns blazing to set the scene for what is effectively a wickedly entertaining love triangle, headed by the bubbly <a href=\"http:\/\/www.imdb.com\/name\/nm0000702\/\">Reese Witherspoon<\/a> as the object of the two studs\u2019 desire.<\/p>\n<p>FDR Foster (Pine) and Tuck (Hardy) have been best friends and top CIA operatives for a long time, enjoying the job and its perks. After a failed relationship, Tuck decides he\u2019ll try Internet dating, and meets up on a date with attractive Lauren (Witherspoon). As fate would have it, after the date ends, FDR happens upon Lauren too. The friends then wage an epic battle against one another after they discover they are dating the same woman, using their CIA arsenal for the job.<\/p>\n<p>Incredulous scenario aside, it is possible to buy into the premise this film offers that two agents would get away with bugging and effectively stalking a young woman for their own gain, however uncomfortable \u2013\u00a0and frankly creepy \u2013 that idea sounds. And it\u2019s the devilish part of the whole affair that you are actually condoning what is a very serious crime by guiltily enjoying the shenanigans. But it\u2019s probably more due to the exciting trio of Reese, Hardy and Pine delivering some riotous chemistry, and the chalk-and-cheese fascination of watching Hardy in his first romcom role and forehead-challenged Pine (with a an even bigger quiff than normal) on screen having a ball playing bad lads.<\/p>\n<p>Hardy still gets to be the tough guy \u2013\u00a0but with the soft centre \u2013\u00a0so it\u2019s not too much of a stretch of the imagination to accept him in this role, and coupled with Tuck\u2019s British self-depreciating nature in his personal life, Hardy sets him up to be the man who needs rescuing by the right woman. There is also an obvious self-mockery laced throughout the whole affair and the performances that keeps things all very tongue-firmly-in-cheek. Once you appreciate that, and combined with some thrilling self-destruction nature, it\u2019s easy to invest in and thoroughly enjoy this.<\/p>\n<p>Like every romcom, the eye candy is abundant and pristinely turned out, and Witherspoon is still very much a sweetheart to treasure in such a role at the \u2018ripe old age of 36\u2019 in romcom territory. Blessed with eternally youthful good looks, she still fits the part perfectly \u2013 unlike Jen Aniston who is getting a tad long in the tooth. Witherspoon brings her own brand of witty retorts and comical facial expressions to this part, and there is a hilarious scene when Lauren goes on an action-packed date with Tuck at a paint-balling park, allowing the actress to sum up how her date\u2019s going with one gurn.<\/p>\n<p>Sadly, thanks to a blatant pointer near the start with \u2018doting dad\u2019 Tuck showing some regret at a relationship lost, it\u2019s plain to see how things are going to end \u2013\u00a0even if there is a moment of doubt at the end, which could have left the boys hanging (making a far better ending than the silly, overly contrived one).<\/p>\n<p>That said this is the start of a new breed of sexy romcom that takes the genre out of its cosy, often urban environment, and adds a little zest to the mix \u2013\u00a0and yes, it does try hard to be appealing to more than the usual romcom fan by adding another angle to keep the genre interesting. <em>This Means War<\/em> is easily consumable, puerile entertainment with some devilish giggles to be had; the action romantic&#8217;s must-see in a sense.<\/p>\n<p><strong>4\/5 stars<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>By @FilmGazer<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/twitter.com\/#%21\/FilmGazer\">Follow on Twitter<\/a><br \/>\n<iframe loading=\"lazy\" src=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/cxDaaGxIufc\" frameborder=\"0\" width=\"560\" height=\"315\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This week\u2019s \u2018date movie\u2019, director McG\u2019s This Means War, is wrapped in an action blanket from the start for romcom lovers weary of lovelorn, sugary angst from the start. Thankfully, it doesn\u2019t start in an idyllic Manhattan suburb either. It comes crashing into fun focus, James Bond style, in the oddly intriguing pairing of Tom &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/filmgaze.com\/blog\/comedy\/this-means-war\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;This Means War ****&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,1,4],"tags":[2131,366,705,2132,2130,1023,2129,54],"class_list":["post-1927","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-action","category-comedy","category-rom-com","tag-bane","tag-chris-pine","tag-jen-aniston","tag-kirk","tag-mcg","tag-reese-witherspoon","tag-this-means-war","tag-tom-hardy"],"aioseo_notices":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/filmgaze.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1927","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/filmgaze.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/filmgaze.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/filmgaze.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/filmgaze.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1927"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/filmgaze.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1927\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1931,"href":"https:\/\/filmgaze.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1927\/revisions\/1931"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/filmgaze.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1927"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/filmgaze.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1927"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/filmgaze.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1927"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}