{"id":2752,"date":"2013-09-13T12:05:30","date_gmt":"2013-09-13T12:05:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/filmgaze.com\/blog\/?p=2752"},"modified":"2013-09-13T12:05:30","modified_gmt":"2013-09-13T12:05:30","slug":"insidious-chapter-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/filmgaze.com\/blog\/thriller\/insidious-chapter-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Insidious: Chapter 2 ***"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Meant to pick up where 2010\u2019s Insidious<\/em> left off, writer-director James Wan and co-writer Leigh Whannell place us in the company of the unfortunate Lamberts again, only this time at grandma Lorraine\u2019s (Barbara Hershey) residence. The first thing that springs to mind is just why Renai Lambert (Rose Byrne) hasn\u2019t run for the hills with kiddies in tow long before now, considering hubby Josh (Patrick Wilson) was outed as hosting the presence of a hideous old hag with bad Joker make-up at the end of the first film.<\/p>\n

An emphasis on strong family bonds is needed to fight this demonic scourge, hence the filmmakers reunite the Lamberts, but things are far from rosy. Wan and Whannell do their best to answer questions from the first film in Chapter 2<\/em>, while creating more confusion and convolution in the process at times. One thing Wan is top of his game at is keeping the tension tightly wound and still providing lots of jumpy moments in what is effectively horror panto.<\/p>\n

The Lamberts \u2013 husband, wife and three young kids \u2013 are trying to rebuild their lives while staying with mother\/grandma (in an equally scary house). However, they soon find they\u2019re still dangerously connected to the spirit world as strange sounds are heard, inanimate objects move by themselves, and ghosts make themselves at home on the sofa.<\/p>\n

This time they face the terrifying ordeal minus the services of murdered medium Elise (Lin Shaye) \u2013 killed at the hands of a possessed Josh in the first film. Desperate to find out why they\u2019re being targeted and what mysterious childhood connection Josh has with the Further spirit no man\u2019s land, the Lamberts call in ghost hunters Specs (Whannell himself) and Tucker (Angus Simpson) again, plus new spooks hunter Carl (Steve Coulter) who can make a connection with Elise and solve the mystery once and for all.<\/p>\n

If astral projection wasn\u2019t enough, there\u2019s now time travel to contend with in the second episode: You have to hand it to Wan and Whannell, they like to make the average haunting affair more meatier by adding other supernatural topics to the mix. The time travel sounds a little over ambitious but it\u2019s used to good effect to explain the current and previous film\u2019s linked events. The trouble is things turn into a fairground attraction with comically painted ghouls who\u2019ll only freak out those with a mannequin phobia.<\/p>\n

The biggest thrill this time is watching a key family member\u2019s sinister transformation, complete with nods to The Shining<\/em> and Psycho<\/em>. Fans of Wan\u2019s recent hit horror The Conjuring<\/em> will note elements of \u2018the biggest threat coming from within\u2019 in this too, though not as half effective.<\/p>\n

In all fairness, Wan\u2019s Insidious<\/em> saga takes itself a little less seriously \u2013 cue Specs and Tucker at work that are not as idiotic this time around. Their banter is never as convincing in diffusing the tension though, as there\u2019s so much going on and we already know what\u2019s going to happen, like journeying to the Further. It\u2019s fairly obvious whom to watch too, so that element of surprise is removed. All that\u2019s at stake is timing of when things get uglier.<\/p>\n

Wan can rely on the same cast as last time to take us along for the scary ride, all doing a serviceable job with the material. Hershey as Lorraine turns sleuth this time, while Wilson gets to be insidious \u2013 something quite refreshing, character-wise, for the actor, a flavour of which we got to see at the end of the 2010 film. It\u2019s especially thrilling given Wilson always plays a \u2018nice guy\u2019 too. Byrne is the tour de force of the piece as tormented and emotionally battered Renai who convinces us of her plight to protect against all odds.<\/p>\n

The question isn\u2019t, is Insidious: Chapter 2<\/em> as scary as the first \u2013 it just further explains events while throwing up other queries. Naturally, The Conjuring<\/em> was based on true events so it\u2019s bound to be more effective in the chills factor. The real question here is, is there enough to drag out the ideas into a third film, however much the ending in Chapter 2<\/em> tries to whet the appetite for such? Still, who knows what subject matter Wan and Whannell will try to weave in next when we\u2019ve had classic haunted house in the first and domestic thriller in the second, according to Wan. The fact will be the writer-director will do the best job he can, putting to use a good array of horror tools and production experience. That\u2019s always a treat to watch.<\/p>\n

3\/5 stars<\/strong><\/p>\n

By @FilmGazer<\/p>\n

Follow on Twitter<\/a>
\n